{"id":355,"date":"2005-05-22T08:07:38","date_gmt":"2005-05-22T13:07:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/wp\/?p=355"},"modified":"2005-05-22T08:07:38","modified_gmt":"2005-05-22T13:07:38","slug":"class-in-america","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/?p=355","title":{"rendered":"Class in America"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The New York Times published part 4 of its series on class in America today.  Great idea, but I think they missed an opportunity.<\/p><p><!--more--><br \/>\nSure, there are a few interesting nuggets to come out of their research, as in, for example, the increasing number of higher income people who now belong to evangelical churches, and the post-2000 shift in &#8220;mixed&#8221; marriages, i.e., for the last five years, it&#8217;s become more common for wealthy women to marry lower-income status men than the pre-millenium reverse tradition.<br \/>\nOverall, though, I found the Times&#8217; bias throughout the series of &#8220;low income: good, high income: bad&#8221; irritating and unrealistic.<br \/>\nThis is especially true of the third segment, on marriage and upward mobility.<br \/>\nThe articles never talk about the bad behavior that I encounter every day from some of the locals here: tailgating, almost always by men in pickup trucks, for example, symptomatic of a deeper feeling of entitlement and territoriality.  I can&#8217;t take credit for this theory:  it was explained to me a couple years ago by one of the &#8220;townies&#8221;, a rough-around-the-edges gent who was unusually honest and articulate about such things.<br \/>\nAnother example: yesterday, a good friend of mine explained the abominable treatment she&#8217;s received in her service job as a result of the working class backgrounds of her customers.  Someone else &#8211; a man &#8211; disagreed with her, but I think she&#8217;s probably right.  The undeserved attacks on her performance have been personal and defamatory, the kind of bad behavior we used to call &#8220;low rent&#8221; and now identify with Karl Rove and the Republican Wrong.<br \/>\nOn the other hand, we know plenty of people in the trades who have been stiffed by the &#8220;haves&#8221;: doctors are reportedly the worst, real estate developers are a close second, etc.<br \/>\nSo, there&#8217;s plenty of nastiness and blame to go around in the not-so-great American class war.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s just too bad that the Times didn&#8217;t present a more balanced perspective, choosing instead to give a platform to a bunch of whiners who have either married into wealth, or (by luck) found their way out of the lower or lower-middle classes.<br \/>\nInstead of being grateful for the opportunities they received, they complained about feeling out of place because they didn&#8217;t have a frame of reference to engage in social chit-chat, or had to think about the right clothes to wear.<br \/>\nSomehow, these seem like minor problems that can be overcome through a little research and a lot of observation, versus knowing that you can&#8217;t pay the rent this month because you lost your job.<br \/>\nThe articles in the Times also neglected to talk about race and the importance of appearance generally in greasing the wheels to upward mobility.  That absolutely floored me, since it&#8217;s the #1 most important factor in success in school, employment and marriage: the elephant in the room that somehow the Times never noticed.<br \/>\nOne last thought: the Times included a clever, Flash-enabled matrix that allows users to discover their social class by education, income, profession.<br \/>\nUnfortunately, they didn&#8217;t provide a way to weight these factors by geographic location.  So, if you live in a high-cost area, the matrix was pretty much useless.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The New York Times published part 4 of its series on class in America today. Great idea, but I think they missed an opportunity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=355"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hendersonbrook.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}